Lab Girl
OVERVIEW
Hope Jahren is a geobiologist from rural Minnesota who not only knows her trees and flowers, but “has some serious literary chops” (Washington Post). Her award-winning, bestselling memoir Lab Girl tells the story of a young woman who finds friendship in odd places, battles bipolar disorder, perseveres through setbacks and relishes hard-earned triumphs, and becomes a respected scientist and passionate observer of the natural world. Called one of the best books of the year by, among others, Entertainment Weekly, Elle, Time, and NPR, the memoir “does for botany what Oliver Sacks’s essays did for neurology, what Stephen Jay Gould’s writings did for paleontology” (New York Times). It’s “Immediately engrossing and extremely readable” (the Guardian). Cheryl Strayed, bestselling author of the memoir Wild, describes it as “deeply inspiring” and award-winning author Ann Patchett says it “makes me wish I’d been a scientist.” “From the prologue on, a reader itches to call out fun facts to innocents nearby,” writes the Seattle Times. “Jahren writes with such flair that a reviewer is tempted to just move out of the way and quote her.”
“People are like plants. They grow toward the light.” – from Lab Girl
INTRODUCTION
“Science has taught me that everything is more complicated than we first assume, and that being able to derive happiness from discovery is a recipe for a beautiful life”—from Lab Girl (p. 29)
Lab Girl is a nature lover’s story about digging in dirt and discovering new things about old growth. It’s a scientist’s story about running experiments and waiting and wondering and asking for funds and fending off doubt. It’s a Midwesterner’s story of moving south and east and west and noticing the differences. It’s a girl’s story about growing up to be what she wants to be. And it’s a woman’s story about fighting stereotypes, sacrificing, feeling vulnerable, trusting in friendship, getting sick, getting help, finding love, and writing it all down. “I used to pray to be made stronger,” Jahren writes in Lab Girl. “Now I pray to be made grateful” (p. 256).
The prologue to Jahren’s memoir is an invitation to the reader: to look out the window; to see something green; to home in on that vision of green—a tree, say; to look more closely at a leaf; and to ask a question about that leaf. “Guess what?” she then writes. “You are now a scientist. People will tell you that you have to know math to be a scientist, or physics or chemistry. They’re wrong…. What comes first is a question, and you’re already there” (p. 4).
Jahren’s own questions have led her to learn fun facts about trees and plants. She shares some of these facts throughout her narrative in short sections that are strategically placed so that they resonate with other parts of her story: “A seed knows how to wait” (p. 30); “No risk is more terrifying than that taken by the first root” (p. 52); “The life of a deciduous tree is ruled by its annual budget” (p. 120); “A vine makes it up as it goes along” (p. 126); “A cactus doesn’t live in the desert because it likes the desert; it lives there because the desert hasn’t killed it yet” (p. 144). The book is “a fascinating portrait of her engagement with the natural world: she investigates everything from the secret life of cacti to the tiny miracles encoded in an acorn seed” (Entertainment Weekly). “My laboratory is like a church because it is where I figure out what I believe,” she writes (p. 19).
In one of the sections on plant life, she writes: “Something so hard can be so easy if you just have a little help. In the right place, under the right conditions, you can finally stretch out into what you’re supposed to be” (p. 31). Though she’s talking about a seed, she could also be talking about her closest friend, Bill, who provides that help and plays a key role in her life.
Jahren first meets Bill in 1994 when she’s a graduate student assistant instructor on a field trip through the Central Valley of California. “It took me about a week to notice that one of our… students—the one who looked like a young Johnny Cash and was perennially clad in jeans and a leather jacket even in 105-degree heat—always somehow ended up several meters away from the edge of the groups, digging his own private hole,” she writes (p. 55). “Looking for gold?” she asks. “I used to live in a hole,” he answers (p. 56), eventually explaining that he moved out of his parents’ home when he was 12 and into an underground fort for a time. “I’m Armenian,” he also tells her. “We’re most comfortable underground” (p. 60). Jahren realizes later that “he was making a dark joke about his father who, as a child, had been hidden in a well during the massacre that had killed the rest of his family.”
Bill moves with Jahren from job to job to work alongside her in her labs in Georgia, Maryland, and Hawaii, and often when they travel to do field research. At Georgia Tech, he lives in his van and then moves into one of the offices at the lab, where he works 16-hour days and becomes “everyone’s counselor and confidant” (p. 139). He remains with her when, in 1998 in Atlanta, bouts of mania take hold and send her spiraling into insomniac periods of extreme highs and lows until she’s finally diagnosed and treated for her bipolar condition. And he stays with her, as her friend and lab partner, when she falls in love with another scientist she meets at a barbeque in Washington, DC. Of love, Jahren writes: “it’s better than a movie, because it doesn’t end, and we are not acting, and I am not wearing any makeup” (p. 207).
Jahren endures a complicated pregnancy and gives birth to a son that has her ruminating at the end of her story on the connection between mature maple trees and their saplings. “No parent can make life perfect for its offspring, but we are all moved to provide for them as best we can.”
“I’m good at science because I’m not good at listening,” writes Jahren. “I have been told that I am intelligent, and I have been told that I am simple-minded. I have been told that I am trying to do too much, and I have been told that what I have done amounts to very little…. I have been admonished for being too feminine and I have been distrusted for being too masculine. I have been warned that I am far too sensitive and I have been accused of being heartlessly callous. But I was told all of these things by people who can’t understand the present or see the future any better than I can. Such recurrent pronouncements have forced me to accept that because I am a female scientist, nobody knows what the hell I am, and it has given me the delicious freedom to make it up as I go along” (p. 277).
Jahren begins her memoir with the message that being a scientist is “not as involved as people make it out to be” (p. 4). Before you read the book, what was your impression of what a “scientist” is? Did your impression shift or expand after reading Lab Girl?
Lab Girl’s first chapter opens with a detailed description of her father’s laboratory, where she loved to spend time as a child. What feelings and messages did she embrace during this period? How did they set the stage for how she felt and acted in her adult life? Is there a setting from your childhood that has played a significant role in your life?
Jahren writes of the emotional distances between members of a Scandinavian family, of “growing up in a culture where you can never ask anyone anything about themselves” (p.11). How does Jahren respond to this cultural attribute she describes? Can you think of cultures or cultural attributes that have played a part in shaping your personality and/or adult pursuits?
Does Jahren’s observation that “being mother and daughter has always felt like an experiment that we just can’t get right” capture something you have experienced, either as a parent or child (p. 16)? Why do you think Jahren dedicated Lab Girl to her mother?
Jahren quotes from the novel David Copperfield by Charles Dickens throughout Chapter 4, as well as other books in subsequent chapters, challenging a common perception that science and literature exist in separate realms. What does she glean from Dickens’ novel? What might literature lovers gain from learning about science? What might scientists learn by reading literary works?
Jahren’s relationship with Bill is a sustained theme in Lab Girl. Why do you think they became friends? What sustains their friendship? What aspects of their relationship—both personal and professional—help each of them through their toughest periods? Was there a scene involving both of them that was particularly moving to you or that you felt captured the essence of their friendship?
In recalling her first scientific breakthrough, Jahren writes, “On some deep level, the realization that I could do good science was accompanied by the knowledge that I had formally and terminally missed my chance to become like any of the women that I had ever known” (p. 71). What were the emotional and practical effects of this moment for Jahren? Can you think of a moment or realization in your life that marks a line between who you are and who you might have been?
How would you describe some of the obstacles Jahren has faced as a woman in a male-dominated field? Have you experienced or witnessed others experience similar obstacles? What other obstacles does Jahren face in her career as a research scientist?
Jahren describes her struggles with mental illness in a gripping and vivid interlude (pp. 144–47). Are you familiar with bipolar disorder? If so, did Jahren’s descriptions resonate with you? If not, did you find her description of her illness illuminating?
Throughout her memoir, Jahren juxtaposes descriptions of human life with that of plant life. Did you find any of the facts she provided about plants particularly interesting? Did you find any parallels between these descriptions and your own life?
Jahren writes of her pregnancy, “I know that I am supposed to be happy and excited…. I am supposed to celebrate the ripening fruit of love and luxuriate in the fullness of my womb. But I don’t do any of this” (p. 217). Why do you think she says this? What factors do you think affect her experience with pregnancy?
On page 198, Jahren describes ancient Arctic ecosystems that are “better characterized as ‘resilient’ than ‘stable.’” What do you think she means? Can you think of situations in your own life that have called for resilience instead of stability?
“Upon gaining new resources, a plant may perform one of four actions: it will either grow, repair, defend, or reproduce itself,” Jahren says (p. 259). Can you think of any circumstances in your own life to which this statement might apply? If so, what decisions did you make, and what factors do you think influenced these decisions?
Jahren chose to keep certain details about Bill's life out of her narrative. What might some of these details be and why do you think she didn’t include them? Why do you think Bill ultimately gave his permission for Jahren to write about him? If you were him, would you have given your permission? If you were Jahren, would you have felt that you needed it?
Take a few moments to stop and look at a tree. What do you see? What might you want to know about what you’re seeing? Is there a tree from your childhood that you remember? If so, why do you think you remember it? What are some actions that we—as individuals and as a society—can take on behalf of a plant or plants?
Source material for these questions provided by Penguin Random House.